Effects of Transactional and Transformational Governance on Academic Teaching


Autor*in(nen): Wilkesmann, Uwe
Jahr: 2013
Dokumenttyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationstyp(en): Empirisches Dokument
 
Themen: Governance, Lernmanagementsysteme, Organisation, Personalentwicklung
 

Abstract

The leadership literature distinguishes two modes of governance, which can also be applied to the governance of universities: transactional and transformational modes of governance. Transactional governance encompasses all forms of managerial governance, which includes selective incentives and monitoring capacity. The theoretical underpinning of this mode can be found in Principal-Agent Theory. Whereas transformational governance covers, on the one hand, the means of restructuring the roles of principals and agents or the interaction situation in the organization, on the other hand, it also addresses all the means of restructuring the relationship between perceived environment and motivation, as can be seen in Self-Determination Theory. Other elements of transformational governance are social norms such as those that inform the quality of research or approaches to teaching. As such, the main research question is: What has more impact on professors’ perceptions of the significance attributed to academic teaching in Germany – transactional or transformational governance? Two hypotheses for transactional and two hypotheses for transformational governance are developed. The research question is answered with the help of two quantitative surveys, one conducted in 2009 with a sample of 1,119 German research university professors and another conducted in 2011 with a sample of 942 German professors from universities of applied sciences. The main findings are that transactional governance has no impact on the perception of the significance attributed to academic teaching whereas transformational governance has ample influence.

Zitation

Wilkesmann, Uwe (2013). Effects of Transactional and Transformational Governance on Academic Teaching. Empirical evidence from two types of higher education institutions. Tertiary Education and Management, 19 (4), 281-300. DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2013.802008. Abgerufen von: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2013.802008.






alle Publikationen anzeigen

Ähnliche Publikationen

Ergebnisbroschüren

Qualifizierung von Akteuren offener Hochschulen

Ergebnisbroschüre

Annika Maschwitz, Katrin Brinkmann (Hrsg.) (2017)

Weiterbildung und Lebenslanges Lernen an Hochschulen

Ergebnisbroschüre

Anke Hanft, Ada Pellert, Eva Cendon, Andrä Wolter (Hrsg.) (2015)

Teilstudien

Zielgruppen Lebenslangen Lernens an Hochschulen

Teilstudie 1

Andrä Wolter, Ulf Banscherus, Caroline Kamm (Hrsg.) (2016)

Organisation und Management von Weiterbildung und Lebenslangem Lernen an Hochschulen

Teilstudie 2

Anke Hanft, Katrin Brinkmann, Stefanie Kretschmer, Annika Maschwitz, Joachim Stöter (2016)

Theorie und Praxis verzahnen. Lebenslanges Lernen an Hochschulen

Teilstudie 3

Eva Cendon, Anita Mörth, Ada Pellert (Hrsg.) (2016)